你可能感兴趣的试题
CMR convention the Hague Rules the Hamburg Rules the Hague-Visby Rules
They justify any actions that protect them from harm. They view public duty as a justification for accidental, but not intentional harm. They consider the motivation of actions when judging the behavior of other children. They, as doers of harmful acts, disregard the feelings of the children they harm.
the kinds of excuses children give for harmful acts they commit. the circumstances under which children punish harmful acts. the justifications children recognize for relieving punishment for harmful acts. the age at which children begin to discriminate between intentional and unintentional harm.
the necessity to apprehend offenders. the responsibility to punish offenders. an obligation to prevent harm to another. the assignment of punishment for harmful action.
the kinds of excuses children give for harmful acts they commit. the circumstances under which children punish harmful acts. the justifications children recognize for relieving punishment for harmful acts. the age at which children begin to discriminate between intentional and unintentional harm.
they do not understand the concept of public duty. they have the ability to make autonomous moral judgments. they regard moral absolutism as a threat to their moral autonomy. they accept moral judgments made by their peers more easily than do older children.
the necessity to apprehend offenders. the responsibility to punish offenders. an obligation to prevent harm to another. the assignment of punishment for harmful action.
being weighed to weigh weighed weighing
they do not understand the concept of public duty. they have the ability to make autonomous moral judgments. they regard moral absolutism as a threat to their moral autonomy. they accept moral judgments made by their peers more easily than do older children.
the punishment is to be administered immediately following the offence. the more immature a child, the more severe the punishment assigned. the punishment for acts of intentional harm is less severe than it is for acts involving acci- dental harm. the severity of the assigned punishment is primarily determined by the perceived magnitude of negative consequences.
To avoid immediate danger When authorized by the rig superintendent To comply with an operator's requirement Under no conditions
children are allowed are children allowed children will allow will children allow
children are allowed are children allowed children will allow will children allow
from the nature of her work is unable to keep out of the way of another vessel does not have a proper look-out by taking action contrary to the Rules has created a special circumstance situation through some exceptional circumstance is unable to maneuver as equired by the rules"
They justify any actions that protect them from harm. They view public duty as a justification for accidental, but not intentional harm. They consider the motivation of actions when judging the behavior of other children. They, as doers of harmful acts, disregard the feelings of the children they harm.
the punishment is to be administered immediately following the offence. the more immature a child, the more severe the punishment assigned. the punishment for acts of intentional harm is less severe than it is for acts involving acci- dental harm. the severity of the assigned punishment is primarily determined by the perceived magnitude of negative consequences.
being weighed to weigh weighed weighing
湘公网安备 43130202000226号