你可能感兴趣的试题
It is totally implausible. It is partially correct. It is highly admirable. It is controversial though persuasive.
many migrants to colonial North America were nor successful financially. New England communities were much alike in terms of their economics and demographics. many migrants to colonial North America failed to maintain ties with their European relations. the level of literacy in New England communities was very high.
Most of them were farmers rather than trades people or artisans Most of them came because they were unable to find work in England They expected that the colonies would offer them increased opportunities They differed from other English people in that they were willing to travel
comparing several current interpretations of early American history. providing the theoretical framework that is used by most historians in understanding early American history. refuting an argument about early American history that has been proposed by social historians. discussing a reinterpretation of early American history that is based on new social research on migration.
comparing several current interpretations of early American history. providing the theoretical framework that is used by most historians in understanding early American history. refuting an argument about early American history that has been proposed by social historians. discussing a reinterpretation of early American history that is based on new social research on migration.
It is totally implausible It is partially correct It is highly admirable It is controversial though persuasive
many migrants to colonial North America were nor successful financially New England communities were much alike in terms of their economics and demographics many migrants to colonial North America failed to maintain ties with their European relations the level of literacy in New England communities was very high
It is totally implausible. It is partially correct. It is highly admirable. It is controversial though persuasive.
comparing several current interpretations of early American history providing the theoretical framework that is used by most historians in understanding early American history refuting an argument about early American history that has been proposed by social historians discussing a reinterpretation of early American history that is based on new social research on migration
Bailyn underestimates the effect of Puritan thought on North American culture. Bailyn overemphasizes the economic dependence of the colonies on Great Britain. Bailyn's description of colonies as part of an Anglo-American empire is misleading. Bailyn failed to test his proposition on a specific group of migrants to colonial North America.
It is totally implausible. It is partially correct. It is highly admirable. It is controversial though persuasive.
Bailyn underestimates the effect of Puritan thought on North American culture. Bailyn overemphasizes the economic dependence of the Colonies on Great Britain. Bailyn’s description of colonies as part of an Anglo-American empire is misleading. Bailyn failed to test his proposition on a specific group of migrants to colonial North America.
comparing several current interpretations of early American history. providing the theoretical framework that is used by most historians in understanding early American history. refuting an argument about early American history that has been proposed by social historians. discussing a reinterpretation of early American history that is based on new social research on migration.
comparing several current interpretations of early American history. providing the theoretical framework that is used by most historians in understanding early American history. refuting an argument about early American history that has been proposed by social historians. discussing a reinterpretation of early American history that is based on new social research on migration.
Bailyn underestimates the effect of Puritan thought on North American culture. Bailyn overemphasizes the economic dependence of the Colonies on Great Britain. Bailyn’s description of colonies as part of an Anglo-American empire is misleading. Bailyn failed to test his proposition on a specific group of migrants to colonial North America.
It is totally implausible. It is partially correct. It is highly admirable. It is controversial though persuasive.
Bailyn underestimates the effect of Puritan thought on North American culture. Bailyn overemphasizes the economic dependence of the colonies on Great Britain. Bailyn’s description of colonies as part of an Anglo-American empire is misleading. Bailyn failed to test his proposition on a specific group of migrants to colonial North America.
Most of them were farmers rather than trades people or artisans. Most of them came because they were unable to find work in England. They expected that the colonies would offer them increased opportunities. They differed from other English people in that they were willing to travel.
Most of them were farmers rather than trades people or artisans. Most of them came because they were unable to find work in England. They expected that the colonies would offer them increased opportunities. They differed from other English people in that they were willing to travel.
Bailyn underestimates the effect of Puritan thought on North American culture Bailyn overemphasizes the economic dependence of the colonies on Great Britain Bailyn’s description of colonies as part of an Anglo-American empire is misleading Bailyn failed to test his proposition on a specific group of migrants to colonial North America
湘公网安备 43130202000226号